Federal IDR payer outcomes

Aetna federal IDR outcomes

See 2025 CMS federal IDR volume, provider offer selection, leave-one-out comparisons, offer levels, defaults, states, specialties, and certified IDR entity mix for responses from aetna.com.

2025 Q1–Q4 · Response domain: aetna.com · Closing-quarter basis

How did providers fare against Aetna in federal IDR?

In 2025, providers had their offer selected on 93.0% of 754,172 decided claim lines answered from aetna.com, across 316,766 disputes. Defaults count as losses in that rate and are reported separately below.

Claim lines

847,212

Across 316,766 disputes

Decided lines

754,172

No-decision lines excluded

Provider win rate

93.0%

Defaults count as losses

Median prevailing offer

396%

Of QPA, uncapped median

416% of QPA median provider offer.

100% of QPA median payer offer.

1.4% default-loss share.

33 days median determination.

Compared with all other payer domains

Aetna compared with all other payer response domains
PopulationProvider win rateMedian prevailing / QPADefault-loss share
Aetna93.0%396%1.4%
All other payer domains85.4%399%2.6%
Benchmark your group's payer-level outcomes

Payer identity

What aetna.com represents

This page groups disputes by the email domain of the responding party recorded by CMS. The report-card pipeline uses response domain because plan names are free text with hundreds of spelling variants.

Plan names as entered by parties

Plan names entered in disputes answered from aetna.com
Plan nameLines
Aetna478,215
AETNA267,568
AETNA HEALTH PLANS68,070
Aetna Health Insurance8,540
Aetna Health Plans8,016

Plan type mix

Plan type mix for aetna.com
Plan typeLines
Either partially or fully self-insured private (employment-based) group health plan577,059
Non-federal government plan (or state or local government plan)109,681
No Plan/Issuer Response97,013
Fully insured private group health plan37,881

Aetna outcomes by closing quarter

The quarter is the quarter in which a dispute closed. These figures are descriptive snapshots. They do not establish a directional pattern because CMS publishes in arrears and can restate records.

Aetna federal IDR outcomes by 2025 closing quarter
Closing quarterLinesDecided linesProvider win rate
2025 Q1189,107182,24896.5%
2025 Q2280,162255,66992.9%
2025 Q3178,831150,86891.3%
2025 Q4199,112165,38790.8%

Where Aetna disputes occurred

State is the CMS Location of Service field. Prevailing-offer figures are uncapped medians and are printed as computed, including unusually high values.

Aetna outcomes by state
StateLinesProvider win rateMedian prevailing / QPA
TX473,91693.3%452%
FL101,21495.5%325%
AZ45,51888.1%333%
NY28,87091.7%286%
NV26,46096.4%276%
CA25,97893.7%248%
NJ24,92690.7%2371%
IN17,08693.2%484%

Specialty mix

Usable specialty labels are grouped into provider categories. The unknown bucket is omitted.

Aetna claim lines by specialty
SpecialtyLinesProvider win rate
Radiology370,72398.5%
Emergency255,94188.2%
Anesthesia43,33985.9%
Hospital medicine34,01392.5%
Surgery23,17292.0%
Neuromonitoring12,22990.0%

Certified IDR entity mix

CMS added the named certified IDR entity field beginning with the 2025 Q3 file. This table covers named Q3 and Q4 records only and should not be compared with the full-year payer totals.

Aetna named certified IDR entities in 2025 Q3 and Q4
Certified IDR entityLinesProvider win rate
Federal Hearings and Appeals Services, Inc.148,91684.7%
Provider Resources, Inc.101,62498.2%
MCMC Services, LLC28,37192.6%
C2C Innovative Solutions, Inc.24,86189.7%
Island Peer Review Organization23,51994.5%
EdiPhy Advisors, L.L.C.20,02598.7%

Methodology, sources, and limits

This page uses all four 2025 CMS Federal IDR Public Use Files for out-of-network emergency and non-emergency items and services. Air ambulance is excluded. Lines are deduplicated to the latest quarterly record.

A payer is the email domain of the responding party recorded by CMS. This page includes responses from aetna.com. Recourse uses response domain because plan names are free text with hundreds of spelling variants.

Win rate is the share of decided lines where the provider offer was selected. Lines with no decision are excluded from both numerator and denominator. Default decisions count as losses and are also shown separately. Disputes are dated by closing quarter.

Provider, payer, and prevailing-offer figures are uncapped medians as a percentage of QPA. Values are printed as computed, including unusually high medians. Leave-one-out comparisons include all other payer response domains.

Source: CMS Federal IDR Public Use Files, 2025 Q1 through Q4. Full calculation rules: Recourse methodology. Browse all profiles: payer outcomes directory.

What the Aetna pattern means for provider groups

Aetna's 93.0% provider offer-selection rate was 7.6 percentage points above the 85.4% leave-one-out rate, while its 396% median prevailing offer was close to the 399% comparison. Its 1.4% default-loss share was materially lower than the 2.6% rate across other payer domains. The combination shows why win rate and dollars recovered must be read separately: a much higher selection rate did not correspond to a meaningfully higher prevailing-offer level.

A provider group's own result can differ because its specialties, services, states, offers, defaults, and filing operations differ from this payer-domain population. The report-card CTA below applies the same measurement framework to the group's own claims.

Your claims involving Aetna

Benchmark your payer-level IDR outcomes.

Request a free per-group report card using the same 2025 CMS methodology, measured against your own payer and claim mix.

Request your free report card