Federal IDR payer outcomes

Cigna federal IDR outcomes

See 2025 CMS federal IDR volume, provider offer selection, leave-one-out comparisons, offer levels, defaults, states, specialties, and certified IDR entity mix for responses from cigna.com.

2025 Q1–Q4 · Response domain: cigna.com · Closing-quarter basis

How did providers fare against Cigna in federal IDR?

In 2025, providers had their offer selected on 81.6% of 326,296 decided claim lines answered from cigna.com, across 78,778 disputes. Defaults count as losses in that rate and are reported separately below.

Claim lines

327,284

Across 78,778 disputes

Decided lines

326,296

No-decision lines excluded

Provider win rate

81.6%

Defaults count as losses

Median prevailing offer

271%

Of QPA, uncapped median

294% of QPA median provider offer.

125% of QPA median payer offer.

4.2% default-loss share.

40 days median determination.

Compared with all other payer domains

Cigna compared with all other payer response domains
PopulationProvider win rateMedian prevailing / QPADefault-loss share
Cigna81.6%271%4.2%
All other payer domains86.7%411%2.3%
Benchmark your group's payer-level outcomes

Payer identity

What cigna.com represents

This page groups disputes by the email domain of the responding party recorded by CMS. The report-card pipeline uses response domain because plan names are free text with hundreds of spelling variants.

Plan names as entered by parties

Plan names entered in disputes answered from cigna.com
Plan nameLines
Cigna105,545
CIGNA94,598
Cigna Healthcare32,573
Cigna Health and Life Insurance18,374
Cigna Health and Life Insurance Company17,499

Plan type mix

Plan type mix for cigna.com
Plan typeLines
Either partially or fully self-insured private (employment-based) group health plan266,059
Fully insured private group health plan30,217
No Plan/Issuer Response21,988
Individual health insurance issuer6,828

Cigna outcomes by closing quarter

The quarter is the quarter in which a dispute closed. These figures are descriptive snapshots. They do not establish a directional pattern because CMS publishes in arrears and can restate records.

Cigna federal IDR outcomes by 2025 closing quarter
Closing quarterLinesDecided linesProvider win rate
2025 Q161,86861,79186.7%
2025 Q294,99794,47079.5%
2025 Q394,12693,84281.5%
2025 Q476,29376,19380.0%

Where Cigna disputes occurred

State is the CMS Location of Service field. Prevailing-offer figures are uncapped medians and are printed as computed, including unusually high values.

Cigna outcomes by state
StateLinesProvider win rateMedian prevailing / QPA
TN71,07282.0%301%
AZ50,98285.7%285%
MS40,20984.2%284%
FL40,13176.0%213%
CA25,82284.3%226%
GA23,85682.3%327%
TX10,87687.3%510%
VA10,47579.9%261%

Specialty mix

Usable specialty labels are grouped into provider categories. The unknown bucket is omitted.

Cigna claim lines by specialty
SpecialtyLinesProvider win rate
Emergency139,71980.0%
Hospital medicine91,50485.4%
Anesthesia44,16183.5%
Radiology32,03992.0%
Neuromonitoring3,79983.3%
Surgery3,66687.6%

Certified IDR entity mix

CMS added the named certified IDR entity field beginning with the 2025 Q3 file. This table covers named Q3 and Q4 records only and should not be compared with the full-year payer totals.

Cigna named certified IDR entities in 2025 Q3 and Q4
Certified IDR entityLinesProvider win rate
C2C Innovative Solutions, Inc.34,80886.3%
National Medical Reviews, Inc.17,24381.7%
Federal Hearings and Appeals Services, Inc.15,35187.6%
Maximus Federal Services, Inc.14,21689.1%
MCMC Services, LLC14,07891.6%
Island Peer Review Organization13,27892.7%

Methodology, sources, and limits

This page uses all four 2025 CMS Federal IDR Public Use Files for out-of-network emergency and non-emergency items and services. Air ambulance is excluded. Lines are deduplicated to the latest quarterly record.

A payer is the email domain of the responding party recorded by CMS. This page includes responses from cigna.com. Recourse uses response domain because plan names are free text with hundreds of spelling variants.

Win rate is the share of decided lines where the provider offer was selected. Lines with no decision are excluded from both numerator and denominator. Default decisions count as losses and are also shown separately. Disputes are dated by closing quarter.

Provider, payer, and prevailing-offer figures are uncapped medians as a percentage of QPA. Values are printed as computed, including unusually high medians. Leave-one-out comparisons include all other payer response domains.

Source: CMS Federal IDR Public Use Files, 2025 Q1 through Q4. Full calculation rules: Recourse methodology. Browse all profiles: payer outcomes directory.

What the Cigna pattern means for provider groups

Providers in disputes answered from cigna.com had an 81.6% offer-selection rate, 5.1 percentage points below the 86.7% rate across all other payer domains. The median prevailing offer was also lower, at 271% of QPA versus 411%, and the 4.2% default-loss share was 1.9 points higher. Tennessee supplied the most lines, but several other states had different win rates and offer levels, reinforcing that a group's own mix can depart from this national payer aggregate.

A provider group's own result can differ because its specialties, services, states, offers, defaults, and filing operations differ from this payer-domain population. The report-card CTA below applies the same measurement framework to the group's own claims.

Your claims involving Cigna

Benchmark your payer-level IDR outcomes.

Request a free per-group report card using the same 2025 CMS methodology, measured against your own payer and claim mix.

Request your free report card